Criminal defense FAQ from The Law Office of Mitchell

New Mexico Criminal Hearings & Court Process FAQ

Criminal cases in New Mexico often involve multiple hearings, court proceedings, and stages, depending on whether the matter involves a felony charge, misdemeanor case, DWI allegation, domestic violence issue, probation violation, or appellate review. Below is a general overview of common hearings and what they may involve.

Criminal Procedure & Pretrial Hearings

An arraignment is a formal hearing at which the Defendant is advised of the charges, enters a plea, and the Court addresses rights, representation, and conditions of release. Guilt or innocence is not determined at this stage.
In some felony cases, a Defendant may formally waive a physical arraignment and enter a plea by filing a written pleading or through counsel, allowing the case to proceed without appearing at that hearing.
The Court reviews custody status, release conditions, detention issues, and, where applicable, bond-related matters. The Court may continue release, modify conditions, or order continued custody.
A first appearance is the Defendant’s initial court hearing after arrest or charging. The Court advises of rights, charges, counsel, and initial release or detention issues.
The Court determines whether probable cause exists to allow the felony prosecution to proceed. The State presents evidence or testimony to show the case should proceed. This is not a determination of guilt.
A grand jury reviews evidence presented by the State and determines whether probable cause exists to issue a felony indictment. This is not a trial or determination of guilt.
If requested by the State, the Court determines whether the Defendant should remain in custody before trial. The State must prove the Defendant is dangerous and that no condition or combination of release conditions would reasonably assure the safety of the community or any one person.
The Court may review or modify release conditions such as supervision, no-contact terms, travel restrictions, monitoring, custody limitations, or other safety-related requirements.
The Court hears legal arguments on issues raised by either party, including procedural disputes, evidentiary issues, constitutional challenges, requests for exclusion, dismissal, or other case-related relief.
The Court determines whether evidence should be excluded due to alleged constitutional violations, unlawful searches, unlawful stops, Miranda issues, unlawful seizures, or other legal defects.

The Court hears testimony, evidence, or witness examination to resolve a specific legal or factual issue before trial, sentencing, or another stage of litigation.

The Court establishes deadlines for discovery, motions, hearings, plea settings, and trial progression. In the District Court, scheduling orders may also assign case-management deadlines under local procedural rules.

The Court reviews general case progress, unresolved procedural issues, scheduling concerns, compliance matters, or whether additional action is required before the next stage.

The Court reviews trial posture, plea posture, witness readiness, scheduling issues, and whether the case remains set for hearing or trial.

The parties and Court address trial readiness, discovery status, negotiation progress, unresolved legal issues, witness concerns, and procedural matters that may affect the trial.
The Defendant may formally accept or reject a plea offer, or the parties may advise the Court of the status of negotiations and any possible resolution. If a plea is entered, the Court may accept, reject, or continue the matter depending on the circumstances.
A party must appear and explain alleged failure to comply with a Court order, payment requirement, procedural obligation, reporting requirement, or other legal directive.

The Court determines whether the Defendant is legally competent to understand the proceedings and meaningfully assist in defense. This does not determine guilt or innocence.

Trial Hearings & Trial Proceedings

A bench trial is decided by a judge rather than a jury. The judge reviews evidence, testimony, witness credibility, and legal argument before determining guilt or innocence.

A jury trial involves jurors hearing evidence, witness testimony, and legal argument before determining whether the State proved guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Potential jurors are questioned to assess fairness, impartiality, legal qualifications, potential bias, and their ability to decide the case fairly.

Before trial, either party may ask the Court to admit, exclude, or limit specific evidence, testimony, or legal argument before it is presented to the jury.

The Court may address evidentiary disputes, witness concerns, procedural issues, admissibility questions, jury issues, or legal motions raised during trial.

After the close of the State’s case-in-chief, the defense may request dismissal if the State’s evidence is legally insufficient to support one or more charges.

Sentencing, Post-Trial & Appellate Review

If a plea or conviction occurs, the Court imposes a sentence that may include probation, incarceration, fines, treatment, supervision, restitution, specialty court considerations, or other conditions, after considering applicable law, argument, and mitigation.

The Court determines whether restitution is legally owed and may decide the amount of financial loss directly tied to the offense.

The Court determines whether probation conditions were violated and whether probation should continue, be modified, or be revoked.

The Court reviews whether the Defendant completed required obligations such as counseling, treatment, fines, classes, supervision, community service, or other court-ordered conditions.

When applicable, the Court may review treatment progress, supervision issues, compliance, eligibility, or continued participation in specialty court programs.

An appeal involves a review of preserved legal error, rulings, sentencing issues, or post-judgment issues, rather than a new trial or reweighing of disputed facts.

If granted by the appellate court, attorneys may present legal arguments regarding appellate issues, preserved rulings, statutory interpretation, or legal error.

DWI Hearings

This is an administrative license hearing involving revocation issues tied to chemical testing, refusal allegations, or related DWI license consequences. It is separate from the criminal DWI case and typically involves strict filing deadlines.

Domestic Violence & Protective Order Hearings

The Court determines whether a civil order of protection should be issued, extended, modified, or dissolved based on the evidence presented. This is separate from a criminal prosecution, though related allegations may overlap.

The Court addresses alleged violations of protective orders, no-contact terms, restraining terms, or related court-imposed restrictions.

The Court may review no-contact provisions, victim-safety restrictions, communication limitations, location restrictions, or release conditions involving proximity or contact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Suspended Sentence?

Under New Mexico law, if you plead guilty to your charge or are found guilty after trial and ultimately receive a suspended sentence, the judge will impose a sentence but suspend its execution in whole or in part.

If a suspended sentence is successfully completed, all obligations to the court and state are discharged. However, the conviction remains on your record until you are able to expunge the charge (if eligible). This means that during background checks for employment, for example, the charge for which you received a suspended sentence will appear as a conviction.

Receiving a suspended sentence instead of a deferred sentence may also affect the restoration of certain rights. Additionally, your eligibility for expungement may be delayed depending on the circumstances.

Under New Mexico law, a deferred sentence requires either an admission of guilt through a guilty plea or a finding of guilt by the judge or jury at the conclusion of the trial. However, with a deferred sentence, the judge does not impose a sentence immediately. Instead, the judge delays sentencing for a certain period, during which you must complete specific requirements, such as supervised probation. If you violate a condition of your deferred sentence, the judge reserves the right to impose a sentence. However, if you successfully complete a deferred sentence, you are not technically convicted of the crime—except for sentencing enhancement considerations in future cases. Upon successful completion, a judge will grant your attorney’s motion for dismissal. As a result, during background checks for employment, your charge will appear as a dismissal rather than a conviction. Additionally, receiving a deferred sentence allows for a faster timeline for restoring lost rights and becoming eligible for expungement (if applicable).

Under New Mexico law, you are allowed only one opportunity for a conditional discharge in your lifetime. A conditional discharge is a privilege, not a right. Whether you are granted a conditional discharge on your felony charge(s) depends on several factors, including how your attorney handles your case, the nature of the charges, the circumstances of the case, and the judge’s discretion.

If you are granted a conditional discharge, the court does not enter an adjudication of guilt. This means that a conditional discharge is not considered a felony conviction. Upon successfully completing the conditional period, you can truthfully state that you have never been convicted of a felony in most circumstances.

Furthermore, if you receive a conditional discharge at sentencing, your lost rights will be restored upon successful completion of the sentence. You will also not be required to pay any mandatory court costs and fees associated with your case. Even better, if you successfully complete a conditional discharge on your felony case, you may be eligible for expungement just one year after completing your sentence.

Many clients contact our office under the mistaken belief that prosecutors are required, either by law or by office policy, to extend three plea offers in every criminal case. This misconception is often fueled by non-attorney advice, online misinformation, or stories passed between defendants in jail or court waiting rooms. However, this belief is patently incorrect.

In New Mexico, a plea offer is a privilege, not a right. There is no statute, rule, or constitutional provision that requires a prosecutor to extend any plea offer—let alone three. The State has full discretion to decide whether to negotiate a resolution or to proceed directly to trial. In fact, a prosecutor could theoretically decline to extend even a single plea offer and take the case to trial from the outset.

While plea negotiations are a common and practical part of the criminal justice process, they exist as a matter of prosecutorial discretion and strategy, not obligation. Defendants should therefore never assume that plea discussions are guaranteed, automatic, or subject to a fixed number of offers.

At Mitchell Law Offices, we make it a point to clarify these misconceptions early in representation. Our role is to aggressively negotiate when possible—but also to prepare for trial from day one, ensuring that our clients’ rights are protected no matter what approach the prosecution takes.

READY TO SPEAK WITH AN ATTORNEY?

Get Experienced Legal Guidance

Free Consultations
Scroll to Top